The book, “The Power of Cash” argues against the push towards a cashless society, highlighting the numerous benefits of cash for individuals, vulnerable populations, national security, and in preventing excessive government and financial control.

Main Themes:

• Cash Provides Essential Utility and Resilience: Cash offers crucial advantages, especially during crises and for vulnerable populations.
• Cash Protects Privacy and Autonomy: Using cash allows for anonymous transactions, safeguarding personal information from businesses and governments.
• Cash Limits the Power of Central Banks and Prevents Negative Interest Rate Harm: The existence of physical currency acts as a brake on central banks’ ability to implement negative interest rates, protecting savers, particularly the elderly.
• Cash Does Not Cause More Crime, Terrorism, or Tax Evasion Than Electronic Payments: The book argues that eliminating cash will not solve these issues and may even shift criminal activity towards digital platforms.
• Cash Prevents Government and Financial Control: A cashless society concentrates power in the hands of governments and financial institutions, potentially leading to restrictions on individual spending and financial exclusion.
• The Push for Cashless is Driven by the Incentives of Financial Institutions and Technology Companies: These entities profit from electronic transactions through fees and data collection.

Key Ideas and Facts:

I. The Importance of Cash for Individuals and Society:

• Resilience During Crises: Cash remains essential during power outages, natural disasters, and cyberattacks when electronic payment systems may fail. The author uses the example of an earthquake disrupting electricity and water supply, emphasizing the immediate need for physical money when digital systems are down.
• “No electricity in Ukraine makes cashless transactions impossible. By using cash, Ukraine is thwarting Russia’s intentions.” (Introduction)
• Sweden’s Civil Contingencies Agency advises citizens to keep a reserve of cash despite being a highly cashless society, acknowledging the vulnerability of digital systems during crises.
• Assisting Vulnerable Populations: Cash is crucial for immigrants, refugees, and tourists who may not have established bank accounts or face challenges with currency conversion and foreign exchange rates.
• The author recounts his personal experience in Greece where a hotel bill emptied his wallet before he could access a laundromat, highlighting the need for readily available cash, especially when facing unexpected situations or dynamic currency conversion issues.
• Protecting Privacy: Cash transactions are anonymous, shielding personal spending habits from businesses and governments that may collect and exploit this data.
• “Our purchases, however, reveal many of our deepest secrets to anyone able to see and piece together our transactions.” (Chapter 9)
• The author provides examples of how seemingly innocuous purchase data can be combined to identify individuals and reveal sensitive information, even within households.
• Limiting Central Bank Power: Paper money acts as a “brake” on central banks, preventing them from imposing deeply negative interest rates that erode savings.
• “Instead, paper money acts as a partial, but not complete, brake on a central bank.” (Chapter 13)
• The book explains how negative interest rates discourage saving and primarily benefit borrowers at the expense of savers, particularly the elderly who rely on their savings.
• Fun and Tangibility: The author includes a “baker’s dozen” reason: cash is enjoyable to hold and use, providing a concrete signal of financial resources.
• “Holding these bills in my hand is fun because they are a concrete signal I have money and can now afford to buy things.” (Conclusion)

II. Debunking Arguments Against Cash:

• Crime: While criminals use cash, the author argues that eliminating it will not eradicate crime but rather push it towards digital methods. Data on bank robberies show a decline, while cybercrime against financial institutions is increasing.
• When asked why he robbed banks, Willie Sutton supposedly replied, “Because that’s where the money is.” (Chapter 14) This quote is used to illustrate that criminals target the dominant form of money.
• The book presents data suggesting a weak correlation between cashless payment adoption and lower corruption levels, using examples like Russia and Switzerland.
• Terrorism: Similarly, the author contends that a lack of cash will not stop terrorism, as evidenced by terrorist activities in highly cashless societies.
• The Department of the Treasury’s “2022 National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment” is cited, though specific findings aren’t detailed in the excerpts.
• Tax Evasion: The example of India’s 2016 demonetization shows that eliminating a large portion of cash did not significantly reduce tax evasion. The author suggests that tax evasion is a complex issue that can be addressed through other means, such as better enforcement and electronic filing.
• “In India, Tax Evasion Is a National Sport.” (Chapter 16, quoting a Bloomberg article title)

III. The Dangers of a Cashless Society:

• Increased Government Control: A fully digital currency system would give governments unprecedented power to track and potentially control individual spending, raising concerns about privacy and potential for abuse.
• “Not only does the state have a complete record of every purchase but also the state has the ability to shut off a person’s access to their money.” (Chapter 17, on government digital currency)
• The possibility of “expiring” digital currency to stimulate spending is presented as an example of extreme economic control.
• Financial Exclusion: A cashless society could disadvantage the unbanked and underbanked populations, making it difficult for them to participate in the economy.
• The reliance on electronic payments can create “debanking” scenarios, as illustrated by the author’s experience in Italy where his cards were temporarily blocked, leaving him without access to funds.
• Vulnerability to Cyberattacks and Infrastructure Failures: Reliance solely on digital payments increases the risk of widespread economic disruption due to cyberattacks on financial institutions or failures in the digital infrastructure.
• The repeated bombing of Ukraine’s electrical grid by Russia highlights the vulnerability of cashless economies during conflict.
• Erosion of Individual Autonomy: The ability for businesses to track and analyze purchasing data allows for targeted advertising and potentially discriminatory pricing, further eroding individual autonomy.
• “there exists a tremendous potential for improving the profitability of direct marketing efforts by more fully utilizing household purchase histories.” (Chapter 9, quoting Rossi and co-authors)

IV. The Push Towards Cashless:

• Incentives of Financial Institutions: Credit and debit card companies, banks, and financial technology firms benefit from increased electronic transactions through interchange fees, data collection, and expanded lending opportunities.
• The author details how credit cards relax the “budget constraint” more than cash, leading to higher spending and thus greater profits for financial institutions.
• Government Incentives: Governments may see benefits in tracking transactions for tax collection and crime prevention, though the book argues against the effectiveness of solely eliminating cash for these purposes.
• Retailer Incentives: While retailers face merchant fees for electronic payments, they often encourage their use due to the potential for increased sales through relaxed budget constraints for consumers.

V. Potential Solutions and Policy Recommendations:

• The author suggests “bureaucratic fixes” such as ensuring ATM availability, adjusting currency transaction report limits for inflation, bringing back larger denomination bills, and enacting legislation requiring businesses to accept cash.
• Specific policies related to “sin” purchases like marijuana are discussed, suggesting cash-only transactions for control while advocating for allowing these businesses access to the banking system for efficient cash recycling.
• Mandatory preparedness for financial companies and regulations ensuring cash infrastructure are also proposed.

Conclusion:

“The Power of Cash” makes a strong case for the continued importance of physical currency in a modern economy. It argues that while electronic payments offer convenience, a completely cashless society poses significant risks to individual privacy, financial inclusion, national security, and could lead to excessive control by governments and financial institutions. The book encourages a balanced approach that recognizes the unique benefits of cash and resists a premature shift towards a fully digital financial system.

The Power of Cash: A Study Guide

Quiz

1. According to the author, what is one significant way it helps vulnerable populations like immigrants and refugees?
2. How does the existence of paper money act as a “brake” on central banks’ ability to implement negative interest rates?
3. The text argues against the idea that eliminating cash would significantly reduce crime. What evidence is presented to support this claim?
4. Give one example from the text of how businesses might use transaction data from electronic payments to their advantage.
5. Explain why the author believes that a government-controlled digital currency could pose risks to individual liberty.
6. Describe one way in which a reliance on electronic payments can make a country more vulnerable during times of conflict or crisis.
7. How do credit cards differ from debit cards in terms of their impact on a consumer’s budget constraint, according to the text?
8. What is “stealth shopping,” and why might someone engage in this behavior using cash?
9. Why does the author suggest that regulations should ensure businesses continue to accept currency payments?
10. What is the concept of the “pain of paying,” and how does using cash relate to this idea?

Answer Key

1. Cash provides immediate and universally accepted value, allowing immigrants and refugees who may lack established bank accounts or face language barriers to easily purchase necessities and services without relying on digital infrastructure or complex verification processes.
2. Paper money offers individuals the option to hold their money outside of the banking system. If interest rates become too negative, people can withdraw cash and hoard it, limiting the central bank’s ability to incentivize spending through negative rates on deposits.
3. The text points to data suggesting that while traditional bank robberies involving physical cash have decreased, cybercrime targeting electronic funds has increased significantly. Furthermore, countries with high rates of cashless transactions do not necessarily have lower rates of corruption or terrorism.
4. A financial technology company could analyze a customer’s grocery spending habits (where and how much they spend) and sell this information to other businesses. These businesses could then use this data to implement custom pricing strategies, charging price-insensitive customers higher rates.
5. A government-controlled digital currency would give the state a complete record of every transaction and the power to potentially freeze or block an individual’s access to their funds. This could be used to control dissent or enforce restrictions on certain types of spending.
6. In a cashless society, an enemy could disrupt a country’s economy by targeting the electronic payment infrastructure through cyberattacks or by disabling the power grid. This would make it impossible for people to access or use their money for essential goods and services.
7. Debit cards allow customers to spend up to the amount of money available in their linked bank account, while credit cards extend the budget constraint further by allowing spending based on the available credit limit, which is typically much higher than the average bank balance.
8. “Stealth shopping” refers to the act of making purchases, often gifts or items one wants to keep secret, without their spouse or family members knowing. Using cash leaves no digital trail that can be easily tracked on bank or credit card statements, thus maintaining privacy.
9. The author argues that mandating the acceptance of cash ensures that all members of society, including the unbanked and those facing technological disruptions, can participate in the economy. It also protects against the potential for businesses to exclude certain customers or impose surcharges on other forms of payment.
10. The “pain of paying” is a psychological concept that describes the negative feeling associated with spending money. Using physical cash can make this feeling more salient because it involves the tangible act of handing over bills, potentially leading to more mindful spending compared to the less transparent nature of electronic payments.

Essay Format Questions

1. Discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of a society transitioning towards a completely cashless economy, drawing upon the arguments and evidence presented in the provided text.
2. Analyze the author’s perspective on the relationship between cash and financial privacy. Evaluate the validity of their concerns in the context of increasing digital surveillance and data collection.
3. Critically examine the arguments made in the text regarding the role of cash in national defense and economic resilience during times of crisis.
4. Evaluate the author’s assertion that eliminating cash would not effectively reduce crime, terrorism, or tax evasion. What alternative solutions does the author suggest, and how persuasive are they?
5. Explore the various incentives driving the push towards a cashless society, as outlined in the text. Which of these incentives do you believe are most influential, and what are the potential consequences of their success?

Glossary of Key Terms

• Central Bank: A financial institution that oversees a country’s monetary system, controls the money supply, and sets interest rates (e.g., the Federal Reserve in the US).
• Negative Interest Rates: A situation where commercial banks are charged a fee for holding reserves at the central bank, intended to incentivize lending and spending.
• Bank Run: A situation where a large number of customers simultaneously withdraw their deposits from a bank due to a fear that the bank will become insolvent.
• Real Interest Rate: The nominal (stated) interest rate adjusted for inflation, representing the true return on savings or the true cost of borrowing.
• Unbanked: Individuals who do not have an account at a financial institution.
• Currency Transaction Report (CTR): A report that financial institutions in the US must file with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) for cash transactions exceeding a certain amount (currently $10,000).
• Government Digital Currency (CBDC): A digital form of a country’s fiat currency, issued and backed by the nation’s central bank.
• Budget Constraint: The limit on what a consumer can purchase based on their available income or funds.
• Stealth Shopping: The act of making purchases privately, often concealed from a spouse or family member.
• Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC): A service offered to tourists using credit or debit cards that allows them to see the cost of their purchase in their home currency at the point of sale.
• Black Market: An illegal or unofficial market where goods and services are traded without regard to government regulations or taxes.
• Tax Gap: The difference between the amount of tax revenue that the government should collect and the amount that is actually collected.
• Financial Privacy: The right of individuals and organizations to keep their financial information confidential.
• Interchange Fee: A fee charged by a bank when one of its cardholders uses their card at a merchant served by another bank.
• Merchant Discount Rate: The fee that a merchant pays to a bank or payment processor for accepting credit and debit card transactions.
• Sin Purchases: Transactions involving goods or services that are often subject to moral or legal restrictions, such as alcohol, tobacco, and gambling.
• Debanking: The act of financial institutions restricting or closing a person’s or entity’s bank accounts and access to financial services

Contact Factoring Specialist, Chris Lehnes